Current financial
Be better prepared to meet the financial management challenges of being a charity trustee or senior charity executive by clicking through the headline links below.
Click on the headlines of your choice.
How charities can prepare for SORP 26
The Charities Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP) is the framework that governs how charities across the UK and Ireland prepare and present their accounts. Designed to improve transparency, consistency and accountability, the updated SORP 2026 introduced some of the most significant changes to charity reporting in over a decade.
From new reporting tiers and lease accounting rules to enhanced impact reporting and sustainability disclosures, charities of all sizes will now need to reassess how they record, monitor and communicate financial and operational information.
Despite the framework being implemented since January, for trustees and finance teams, the challenge is not simply understanding the technical changes, but ensuring charities are prepared operationally and strategically.
Here are the most important changes charities should prioritise now and how early planning can reduce compliance risk while strengthening governance and stakeholder trust.
Which reporting tier applies
One of the biggest structural changes under SORP 2026 is the introduction of a new three-tier reporting framework, which reflects wider expectations around transparency. Rather than applying largely uniform requirements across the sector, the revised SORP introduces scaled reporting obligations based on gross annual income.
-
Tier 1: Charities with gross income up to £500,000:
- simplified reporting obligations,
- can report income and expenditure by natural classification rather than by activity,
- may apply the exemption in Section 7 of FRS 102 for small entities, which removes the requirement to prepare a statement of cash flows.
-
Tier 2: Charities with gross income between £500,000 up to £15 million:
- must adopt activity-based reporting,
- are subject to more detailed disclosure requirements than Tier 1,
- are generally exempt from preparing a statement of cash flows if they meet the small entity exemption under FRS 102.
-
Tier 3: Charities with gross income over £15 million:
- have the most comprehensive reporting requirements,
- must prepare mandatory statement of cash flows,
- must provide enhanced disclosures on impact reporting, volunteer contributions and sustainability covering environmental, governance and social matters.
Building on the previous level
Each tier builds upon the requirements of the previous level, meaning larger charities face significantly greater disclosure obligations.
Although this approach is intended to simplify reporting for smaller charities, it also means trustees must have a clear understanding of where their charity sits and how future growth could alter reporting obligations. Charities should monitor gross income closely to anticipate tier movements and avoid unexpected compliance pressures.
Changes to income recognition
Income recognition is another area where SORP 2026 introduces significant reform. The updated guidance aligns more closely with revised FRS 102 requirements and changes how charities account for grants, contracts and legacy income.
For many charities, distinguishing between grant income and contract income will become increasingly important. Charities delivering services under contractual arrangements may need to recognise income differently depending on when performance obligations are met.
Exchange transactions occur where your charity provides goods or services of approximately equal value to what it receives (e.g. contracted services, membership fees, training courses and charity shop sales). In these cases, the five-step model below applies:
- Identify the contract with a customer.
- Identify the performance obligations in the contract.
- Determine the transaction price.
- Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations.
- Recognise revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
Non-exchange transactions occur where resources are given without receiving equal value in return (e.g. donations, grants without service delivery obligations, and legacies).
Performance model instead
For government grants specifically, the "accrual model" permitted under FRS 102 Section 24 is not allowed by the SORP. Charities must use the performance model instead, recognising income only when entitlement and performance conditions are met.
Legacy income also remains an area of complexity. Under the revised guidance, charities will need stronger evidence and more robust internal processes to determine when legacy income can be recognised within the accounts.
These changes may require charities to revisit funding agreements, review accounting policies and improve communication between finance and fundraising teams. Without early preparation, charities risk inconsistent reporting or delays during year-end processes.
Keep an active log of all legacies and updates from executors as changes in valuations or disputes can quickly affect when and how much income you can recognise.
Leases and financial commitments
SORP 2026 introduces revised lease accounting requirements that will affect many charities, particularly those operating from leased properties or using leased equipment.
Under the updated rules, most leases will need to appear on the balance sheet, increasing visibility around financial obligations and long term liabilities. For some charities, this could significantly alter reported financial positions and key financial ratios.
This is not simply an accounting exercise. Trustees will need to understand how these changes could affect reserves, covenant compliance, future borrowing and stakeholder perceptions. Finance teams should begin reviewing lease agreements now to identify which arrangements may be impacted.
The revised SORP also includes updated guidance around provisions and contingencies, helping charities better assess commitments and liabilities. For grant-making charities with multi-year funding commitments, this area will require particular attention.
To stay one step ahead, maintain a live lease register including lease terms, renewal options and payment schedules to streamline transition and impact assessment. When leases are granted at below market rates, calculate the social donation value by comparing market rent to actual charges. This difference may be material and, when recognised as income, could impact your charity's tier classification.
Trustees’ annual reporting
The Trustees’ Annual Report is expected to become far more important under SORP 2026. Rather than acting solely as a narrative overview, it is increasingly being treated as a critical accountability document that links organisational impact directly to financial performance.
All charities will need to provide clearer commentary on aims and objectives, achievements, future plans and financial resilience. The revised guidance also places stronger emphasis on impact reporting and demonstrating how charitable activities benefit both individuals and wider society.
Tier 2 and Tier 3 charities face additional expectations around environmental, social and governance matters, including sustainability practices and governance transparency. Charities will also be encouraged to recognise volunteer contributions where measurable.
For trustees, this represents an opportunity as much as a compliance challenge. Stronger narrative reporting allows charities to communicate impact more effectively, reinforce donor confidence and demonstrate responsible stewardship of resources.
Systems, processes and governance
Many charities underestimate the operational impact of SORP changes. However, compliance is not achieved solely through updated financial statements. It depends on whether underlying systems and controls can support the new requirements.
Finance teams should review whether current accounting systems can accommodate revised income recognition rules, enhanced disclosures and lease accounting obligations. Charities may also need stronger processes for collecting non-financial information related to impact, sustainability and governance.
Trustees should consider whether internal expertise is sufficient to manage the transition. In some cases, additional training or external support may be required to ensure staff and trustees fully understand the implications of the new framework.
Using SORP as an opportunity
While much of the discussion around SORP 2026 focuses on technical accounting changes, charities should also view the reforms as an opportunity to strengthen organisational transparency and stakeholder confidence.
The sector is operating in an environment of increased scrutiny, with donors, regulators and funders placing greater emphasis on accountability, impact and sustainability. The revised SORP framework reflects this broader shift.
Charities which approach the changes strategically can use enhanced reporting to improve governance, strengthen relationships with stakeholders and better demonstrate the social value they create. In many cases, clearer reporting may also support future fundraising efforts and funding applications.
For trustees and finance teams, preparation will be critical. Reviewing accounting policies, strengthening reporting processes and understanding the wider operational implications should begin well before implementation deadlines.
Ultimately, charities which plan proactively will be best positioned to adapt successfully and demonstrate long term resilience under the new SORP framework.
"For many charities distinguishing between grant income and contract income will become increasingly important."
"Finance teams should review whether current accounting systems can accommodate revised income recognition rules, enhanced disclosures and lease accounting."
Charities enhancing the quality of their audits
Audits may not be the most exciting prospect for charities, but with increasing scrutiny on audit quality, there is a pressing need to elevate the standards of the external audit process. While the focus on audit quality stems from high profile corporate failures, the benefits extend to all organisations requiring external audits, leading to enhanced value for money.
While auditors bear a significant portion of the responsibility for audit quality, the Financial Reporting Council's publication, What makes a good environment for auditor scepticism and challenge (November 2022), highlights the role of audited organisations. Charities must recognise their duty in fostering a well-functioning ecosystem that facilitates high quality audits. To this end, collaboration and cooperation between charities and auditors are key to achieving this.
Charities also play a vital role in supporting the audit process by providing necessary information and establishing effective channels of communication with auditors. Active engagement throughout the audit helps ensure comprehensive and accurate examination of financial statements. Charities should view the audit as an opportunity to showcase their commitment to transparency and accountability.
Treat audits as projects
Given the challenges faced by charity finance managers, it is crucial to treat audits as projects. By implementing structured systems and processes, charities can ensure deadlines are met, effectively manage audit fees to prevent escalation, facilitate a smooth process, and produce high quality audit documents on time. Respecting the audit process and treating it with due diligence can significantly enhance audit quality.
To support the audit process, charity finance managers should prioritise effective planning and resource allocation. Allocating sufficient time and resources, including personnel, for gathering required information and facilitating communication with auditors is essential for ensuring efficiency and effectiveness in audits. Adequate preparation helps minimise disruptions of day-to-day operations and contributes to overall audit quality.
Charities should adopt a mindset of continuous improvement throughout the audit process. Actively engaging with auditors, seeking feedback and identifying areas for enhancement in financial management practices contribute to strengthening internal controls. Implementing recommended improvements not only elevates audit quality but also paves the way for more efficient and effective audits in the future.
Good practices in reality
The following behaviours lead to great audit quality:
- Regular communication with the auditor is top of the list – and throughout the year rather than during the main audit timetable. Going into audits with open eyes means that everyone is on the front foot and well prepared.
- Consult with the auditor about any contentious areas of judgment or complex technical issues well in advance of the audit. If discussing these in meetings, invite the auditor to attend the discussion and seek agreement early on. Also provide full papers on these issues setting out the conclusions reached before the financial statements are prepared.
- Ensure the charity finance team are fully engaged with and have bought into the deliverables and agreed timetable. Check in advance that these can be met, and that there is some slack built into normal daily tasks and the unexpected. The team need to be available during the agreed audit timetable.
- Achieve brilliant basics. A first draft set of accounts that balances, that reconciles to all of the underlying records, and is fully complete in terms of the primary statements, notes, accounting policies and all disclosures is a must. Auditors are not just auditing the numbers. Ideally, this set of accounts will have gone through a robust review process by the charity before being submitted for audit.
- Accept things don’t always go to plan and be prepared to be flexible around meeting dates and circulation deadlines – if the originally agreed audit timetable is not met, these will need to change.
Common pitfalls to avoid
There are also some common pitfalls to avoid to ensure the audit process is smooth.
Firstly, if people aren’t available during the scheduled audit visits or they provide information that is either late, incomplete or of poor quality.
Another issue would be to start the audit without a full set of draft accounts.
Good communication is also vital during the audit process so other issues would be failing to respond to queries or requests for information during the audit, not engaging in detailed discussions relating to audit findings or complex issues and insisting on an inflexible timetable. However, these are all easily avoided by thinking ahead and adopting a project management mindset to the audit process.
Preparation is key
Preparing in advance is vital and it may help to consider the following questions:
Capacity and availability:
- Does the finance team have enough resources and capacity to deliver to the agreed plan?
- Will the team be available to answer the auditor’s queries? Providing the initial information requested on time is great, but there will be follow up questions.
Quality and timely information:
- Has the team been fully resourced throughout the financial year?
- Are the underlying records of good quality, and have internal controls been operating effectively?
- Have there been any IT or systems issues? What might need to be communicated to the auditor about this at the start of the process?
- If preparing the statutory accounts, can the team provide these to the auditor before the start of the main audit visit? This includes all notes and narrative disclosures.
- The trustees’ annual report is covered by the audit – this is often provided very late so consider if this can be provided along with the financial statements.
Knowledge and expertise:
- Does the team have the expertise to prepare what has been agreed with the auditor?
- Has the team engaged the right experts to help – surveyors for property valuations, third party firms for stock counts etc.?
Contribution to good governance
Charities may have a full audit or finance committee, or perhaps a trustee with a finance focus as a treasurer. Whoever is responsible for audit governance needs to be actively engaged in the process with a good understanding of what produces a good quality audit.
This includes overseeing the auditor and ensuring they have everything they need, as well as checking the management team are delivering. This starts with engaging with the audit plan and considering whether the timetable is realistic. It’s recommended that there is enough time allocated and that those involved are not put under unnecessary pressure.
During the process it’s prudent to check in with the management team to ensure key milestones have been delivered on time. If the timetable is behind, then look at how people can be supported to get things back on track.
Reviewing the trustees’ annual report and accounts at an early stage to check if anything is out of sync with expectations is important. This includes asking management whether the accounts contain any significant estimates or judgments which need to be understood and challenged.
Reviewing and challenging the assessment on a going concern basis (the charity’s ability to continue operating for 12 months from the date of approval of the accounts) before it is presented to the auditors is essential to ensure agreement.
Once the auditor presents the audit findings it is important to read the papers in advance and ask questions. This is the opportunity to ensure the charity is getting the assurance it wants from the process.
At the end of the process holding a debrief session with the auditor (without management) to see how things could be improved next time is recommended. Consider if there were any conflicts during the audit as well as the auditor’s feedback on how the process went and how the audit was valued.
Expecting more questions
Auditors are trained to have questioning minds and to apply professional scepticism. There are also new requirements to consider contradictory evidence, as well as corroborative evidence, so charities need to expect more questions challenging what they are sharing with them. It’s worth reiterating the earlier point that the better the quality of the underlying information that is provided, the more time is available to think and provide constructive challenge. This is where the focus of the audit should be.
Charities shouldn’t be apprehensive about an audit. Being open and valuing the purpose of the audit can drive up audit quality which will ultimately help the charity be more effective.
"Charities should adopt a mindset of continuous improvement throughout the audit process."
